Subscribe to Naomi's blog and receive a notification every time Naomi posts a new article.Click to Subscribe

ISRAEL WAR DIARY: 22 JUNE 2025

Each week when I think it can’t get any more life-changing and dramatic, it does.

This has its consequences. Last week I “lost” two days. My husband woke me up Friday morning asking if we needed to buy challot for Shabbat, and I answered: “Why would we, since it’s Wednesday?”

Honestly, those days went into a sinkhole of memory created by all my usual activities being canceled and being stuck in the house near a shelter so that one day runs seamlessly into the next, until sunrises and sunsets pass almost unnoticed, and the hours of the day are unutilized.

But in that vacuum of activity, big changes are happening inside all Israelis. As we read in this week’s Bible portion, the Hebrew spies returned with reports that weakened the will of the people to oppose their enemies, saying, among other things that the inhabitants of the land were giants, and “we were like grasshoppers to them and to each other.”

Many times in facing the threat of the evil Iranian Islamic empire, many Jews in Israel have felt like that. Our just war against Iran, the magnificent work of the IDF and our brave, young pilots have changed that narrative. Despite the cowardly missile attacks by Iran against our hospitals, a building at the Weizmann Institute where decades of life-saving medical research have been erased, apartment buildings, and retirement homes, no Israeli feels like a “grasshopper” anymore. There is great pride, and great courage among the Israeli people. After each missile attack, as we emerge from our shelters miraculously unharmed despite total destruction all around us, we urge our military and our government to fight on. As our Prime Minister said: “We started this war digging bodies out of the ground with our bare hands, and ended it beside the greatest military force in the world using the most advanced military equipment.”

The decisive step of our dear, brave, and faithful friend in the White House, Donald Trump, in removing this threat from the world as well as coming to Israel’s aid, gave all of us renewed hope, deepening our determination to continue this battle until Iran can no longer threaten us, or anyone else.

Abu Ali summarizes:

“Trump’s America has proven that it is not afraid to strike when necessary, in contrast to the restrained and defensive/logistical policy adopted by Western countries (including the Biden administration) in recent years.

1. This is an important boost to America’s deterrence power.

2. This is a very significant boost to Israel’s deterrence power.

Trump’s America doesn’t just talk. It acts – something many assumed would not happen. Another central point is this: from now on, there is a precedent – the United States has directly struck Iran, alongside Israel. The next strike, if needed, will already be much easier.”

In the meantime, our soldiers continue to attack Iranian rocket launchers and military facilities, as well as nuclear scientists who are targeted in their beds.

Reports analyzing the Fordow attack says the bombs were aimed at the centrifuges enriching uranium. Iran says that it had moved its enriched uranium from Fordo two days before the strike and it is now in another facility. Indeed, we have seen photos of lines of trucks outside the facility days earlier. Unfortunately, these were dump trucks, open on top, used to drop material in front of the entrances to block an Israeli commando attack. Besides, why would Iran take this material out of THE MOST FORTIFIED SITE in Iran and put it somewhere else? Like, under Khamenei’s bed? You can’t transfer enriched uranium in Tupperware without fear of setting off a nuclear reaction or leaking radiation.

But I understand their frustration. It is estimated that over the years Iran has spent a half trillion dollars on their nuclear program and arming their proxies, all of which has now gone up in smoke. They are as foolish as they are stupid and cruel. True savages.

And while we are on the subject of “stupid,” Israelis report receiving phone calls with recorded messages from Iran prior to missile launches which tell them the “Zionist regime is lying to you and sounding sirens just to scare you.” The purpose? To convince Israelis not to go into their shelters in order to maximize death among Israeli civilians. I guess it really bothers them that our shelters are saving our lives and there is not a damn thing they can do about it. Savages.

This morning, 20-30 Iranian missiles were launched against us, and another ten just as rescuers were reaching the affected areas. No one was killed. Two were injured seriously, and the rest had light injuries.

If you see the impact sites, this is truly miraculous. They look exactly like parts of Gaza. But unlike the Gazans, whose leaders spent their budget on useless terror tunnels, we built strong shelters that save our people’s lives, because unlike our enemies, who have stated that for them “life begins at death” (no, not kidding, that’s what they say, which is why they are so dangerous to themselves and the rest of the world) while to us, life begins at birth, and preserving life is sacred. The ritual after each sojourn in our shelters is to touch base with the extended family everywhere, to make sure wherever the missiles landed, they weren’t nearby.

Israel has returned another three hostages murdered on Oct. 7 whose bodies were kidnapped to Gaza (tell me, who does that? Kidnap dead bodies? Savages.) From Abu Ali: “In a special operation carried out by the ISA and the IDF, the bodies of the hostages Ofra Keidar, Yonatan Samerano, and Staff Sergeant Shay Levinson were recovered from the Gaza Strip Saturday.

“Ofra Keidar, a member of Kibbutz Be’eri, was brutally murdered and abducted from the kibbutz on October 7, 2023, by Hamas terrorists. Ofra, who was 71 at the time of her death, was a mother of three and the wife of Shmuel Keidar, who was also murdered by Hamas terrorists in their home in Be’eri.

“Yonatan Samerano was brutally murdered and abducted from Kibbutz Be’eri on October 7, 2023, by Hamas terrorists, including a UNRWA employee, after fleeing the Nova music festival. Yonatan was 21 years old at the time of his death.

“Staff Sergeant Shay Levinson, a tank commander in the Oz (77) Battalion, engaged and fought terrorists on the morning of October 7 and fell in combat. He was then abducted by Hamas terrorists. Shay was 19 years old when he fell.”

I’d like to end with a spiritual message I actually heard on Facebook (or was it Instagram?). I ask pardon from the author for not remembering their name. This is what it said: “I was reading the Bible and came across a passage about how God purifies his people the way a silversmith purifies silver. I didn’t understand what that meant, so I asked a silversmith if I could spend some time with him to see him work. I saw how he held the silver over the highest flame in the most intense heat, watching over it very, very carefully. Just a moment too long, would destroy it, he said. ‘How do you know when the material is fully purified?’ I asked him. And he answered: ‘When I can see my face in it.’ ”

This will be over when God sees His face in us.


Spread the word. Share this post!

8 comments on “ISRAEL WAR DIARY: 22 JUNE 2025”

  1. Kenny

    As for the Americans going back to the negotiating table . . . with anyone

    Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with. Because this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life, and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you. And that prince who, relying entirely on their promises, has neglected other precautions, is ruined; because friendships that are obtained by payments, and not by greatness or nobility of mind, may indeed be earned, but they are not secured, and in time of need cannot be relied upon; and men have less scruple in offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails.

    https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1232/1232-h/1232-h.htm#chap17

      • Kenny

        It remains now to see what ought to be the rules of conduct for a prince towards subject and friends. And as I know that many have written on this point, I expect I shall be considered presumptuous in mentioning it again, especially as in discussing it I shall depart from the methods of other people. But, it being my intention to write a thing which shall be useful to him who apprehends it, it appears to me more appropriate to follow up the real truth of the matter than the imagination of it; for many have pictured republics and principalities which in fact have never been known or seen, because how one lives is so far distant from how one ought to live, that he who neglects what is done for what ought to be done, sooner effects his ruin than his preservation; for a man who wishes to act entirely up to his professions of virtue soon meets with what destroys him among so much that is evil. Hence it is necessary for a prince wishing to hold his own to know how to do wrong, and to make use of it or not according to necessity.

        Therefore, putting on one side imaginary things concerning a prince, and discussing those which are real, I say that all men when they are spoken of, and chiefly princes for being more highly placed, are remarkable for some of those qualities which bring them either blame or praise; and thus it is that one is reputed liberal, another miserly, using a Tuscan term (because an avaricious person in our language is still he who desires to possess by robbery, whilst we call one miserly who deprives himself too much of the use of his own); one is reputed generous, one rapacious; one cruel, one compassionate; one faithless, another faithful; one effeminate and cowardly, another bold and brave; one affable, another haughty; one lascivious, another chaste; one sincere, another cunning; one hard, another easy; one grave, another frivolous; one religious, another unbelieving, and the like. And I know that every one will confess that it would be most praiseworthy in a prince to exhibit all the above qualities that are considered good; but because they can neither be entirely possessed nor observed, for human conditions do not permit it, it is necessary for him to be sufficiently prudent that he may know how to avoid the reproach of those vices which would lose him his state; and also to keep himself, if it be possible, from those which would not lose him it; but this not being possible, he may with less hesitation abandon himself to them. And again, he need not make himself uneasy at incurring a reproach for those vices without which the state can only be saved with difficulty, for if everything is considered carefully, it will be found that something which looks like virtue, if followed, would be his ruin; whilst something else, which looks like vice, yet followed brings him security and prosperity.

        https://pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca/theprince/chapter/15/

      • Kenny

        BG,

        These are excerpts from “The Prince.” In his book, Machiavelli advises political leaders that they may very well have to appear to have all the “virtues” of the day, but in reality, they must be able to act contrary to what is commonly thought to be “good.”

        However, Machiavelli’s work is more subversive than that, insofar as he challenges his readers to think about what those “virtues” actually are. If a leader desires a reputation for clemency, and allows unrest within his own country, or permits a threat to arise in a neighbouring country, he may gain a reputation for kindness and tolerance, and will not be called “cruel.”

        However, if one looks at the consequences of such choices on the part of a leader, we can see (Machiavelli provides an example) that in the long run, allowing such things to grow either within one’s country or near to one’s country, can have catastrophic consequences, sometimes involving considerable loss of life.

        So what does it mean to be “kind” or “tolerant” – or “cruel”?

        If a leader’s “tolerance” towards troublemakers and indeed, evil human beings, leads to death and destruction throughout his country, and this was a “foreseeable risk” when he made the decision to allow it to go unchecked, then what does it even mean to be “cruel”? isn’t that leader’s behaviour, which logically can be considered a necessary condition for the long term violence, death and destruction that is visited upon his people, actually an example of . . . cruelty?

      • Kenny

        Another way of looking at these things: In the UK, there is legislation which obliges all employers to carry out “suitable and sufficient” risk assessments – what this means is that the likelihood of exposure to a particular hazard is established, as is the consequences if that happens. These two variables are then plotted out on a risk assessment matrix, in order to give a risk level.

        The first time this is done, the risk level is called the “initial” risk.

        If the risk level is high or very high, then whatever it is one is assessing simply cannot be allowed to happen. Some sort of “control measure” must be devised and implemented – this will either reduce the likelihood of exposure to the hazard under consideration, or the consequences of that happening.

        A second risk assessment will then be carried out – with the control measure in place, the “residual” risk level can be established. (Obviously, this will show how effective the “control measure” will be.)

        If the control measure will indeed reduce the risk level to an acceptable level, then it will have to be implemented – and the situation has to be reviewed regularly to make sure the risk level remains acceptably low.

        Seen in this like, the American GBU 57/AB weapons certainly seem to have been an effective “control measure.”

  2. Kenny

    On the subject of the American / Israeli bombing of Iran: think long term consequences.

    From Chapter 17 of The Prince:

    Coming now to the other qualities mentioned above, I say that every prince ought to desire to be considered clement and not cruel. Nevertheless he ought to take care not to misuse this clemency. Cesare Borgia was considered cruel; notwithstanding, his cruelty reconciled the Romagna, unified it, and restored it to peace and loyalty. And if this be rightly considered, he will be seen to have been much more merciful than the Florentine people, who, to avoid a reputation for cruelty, permitted Pistoia to be destroyed.[1] Therefore a prince, so long as he keeps his subjects united and loyal, ought not to mind the reproach of cruelty; because with a few examples he will be more merciful than those who, through too much mercy, allow disorders to arise, from which follow murders or robberies; for these are wont to injure the whole people, whilst those executions which originate with a prince offend the individual only.

    [1] During the rioting between the Cancellieri and Panciatichi factions in 1502 and 1503.

    https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1232/1232-h/1232-h.htm#chap17

  3. Kenny

    I see the American bombing of Iran as being very similar to Lord Exmouth’s naval bombardment of Algiers in 1816 – a punitive action that caused an attitude adjustment on the part of the Mohammedans, and which led to successful negotiations between the two parties and a return of all of the hostages taken and kept in slavery by the Mohammedans. (It is a little known fact that the Mohammedans of the Barbary States captured and enslaved over a million white Europeans (and a considerable number of Americans) over a period of hundreds of years. When the Europeans and the Americans tried to get their hostages back, they found out that bribery didn’t work, and paying “tribute” didn’t work. The use of overwhelming military force worked.)

    https://www.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/rmgc-object-12109

    (Note that when Exmouth bombarded Algiers, war was not declared, nor did it ensue. It was simply recognised that when diplomacy failed with the Mohammedans in the Barbary States, bombs worked.)

  4. BG

    Astounding event!! Last night, I filed a memo to distribute copies of President Trump’s brief speech on Thanksgiving Day at everyone’s table place setting just as I do with Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address.

    I listened to Bari Weiss of the Free Press monitor a panel of experts before President Trump made his remarks to the nation. I joined the Zoom broadcast just as Amit Segal was finishing his remarks. He said that the bombing of the Iranian nuclear sites would be a watershed in geopolitics. Only when the US approved the existence of the State of Israel in 1948 was there a previous moment of unparalleled agreement between the US and Israel.

    I appreciate that this past Shabes we read the parsha Sh’lach and the haftorah from the Book of Joshua that accompanies it. As I read the haftorah I dwelled on the words in the Amidah, in English translation, (G-d) plants the seeds of salvation.

    This may be Purim 2!

Comments are closed.

Discover more from Naomi Ragen נעמי רגן

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading